Suitable location analysis can be done for many land uses. For example, the figures on this page show suitable locations for residential development in the Sasolburg area. Multicriteria Land Suitability Evaluation, Analytical Hierarchy Process and PairWise Comparison with GIS techniques are used to identify suitable locations. The three (3) small figures show the data input for the analyses. The top one represents residential growth; the middle figure residential and vacant residential properties and the last one the proximity to schools. The dark blue areas in the bigger figure show the most suitable locations for residential development.
Flood risk mapping as part of flood risk assessment is an important part of a floodplain management system. Floodplain management A little about floodplain management. Already in 1996 Miller et al., stated that majority of damages appeared to result from unwise use of floodplain areas, it became increasingly clear that careful land use planning, in combination with engineering, architectural and hydrologic measures, could be employed to avert local flood damage. Floodplain management is defined as “… a decision-making process whose goal is to achieve appropriate use of the nation’s floodplains. Appropriate use is any activity or set of activities compatible with the risk to natural resources (natural and beneficial functions of floodplains) and human resources (life and property) …”. The basic challenge of the flood problem is the development of a set of management strategies which can permit more intensive use of floodplains and yet minimise potential damages (Milliman, 1984). Floodplain management system Floodplain Management System is a system that exists of different actions that together form a structure to manage a flood plain (“Floodplain Development Manual” which was published by the New South Wales Government in 1986 and updated in 2005). The system is shown in the following figure. Floodplain Risk Management Committee The main aim of such a committee is to assist a municipality in the development and implementation of a flood plain management plan. The floodplain management committee can be a sub-committee of the municipalities Disaster Management Advisory Forum. Flood study Flood studies define the nature and extent of possible flood events. The first action is the demarcation of the flood plain through hydrological and hydraulic studies. Demarcation of areas in the floodplain It is necessary to divide the floodplain into categories descriptive of the impact that development may have on floodwater and the impact that floodwater may have on development. This will include land use and land cover assessments. Flood plain management studies Flood plain management studies are undertaken to identify and evaluate the effectiveness of suitable measures. Measures can be classified as structural and the latter as non-structural measures. Flood risk assessment must be completed to evaluate measures. The figure below shows the results of flood damage estimation for Upington, Northern Cape. The possible damage can now be used in cost benefit analysis to determine the most appropriate measures. Flood plain management plans Before a floodplain management plan can be drawn up, it must be assured that the plan measures up to specific criteria. Objectives can include: The use of land that is prone to floods must be planned and managed in such a way that it is compatible with the calculated frequency and extent of floods. Land that is prone to floods must be managed in such a way that social, economic and ecological costs and benefits are considered. Plan Implementation A project implementation plan must be developed and executed. In South Africa this must be done through the IDP process.
Introduction An important part of disaster management is the communication of information to stakeholders. It can by disaster management practitioners and/or the public. Mechanisms to do this must keep up with the times. The question is also what format of reporting will enhance the ability to utilize data or information from disaster risk assessments? What happen to the hardcopy reports after the assessment? Does in gather dust in the cabinet? How fast can you retrieve information from the report? Can you easily link information from the report to a specific location? Can you apply your own thinking to do analysis on the data in the report? This post is about the investigation if story maps, as used in ESRI online, can be used for reporting results of disaster risk assessment. Story maps What is story maps? “Esri Story Maps let you combine authoritative maps with narrative text, images, and multimedia content. They make it easy to harness the power of maps and geography to tell your story.” https://storymaps.arcgis.com Disaster risk assessment’s story is about the description of hazards and risks and showing the possible impact areas including communities, environment and infrastructure. What better way to describe the impact by doing it with maps linked to a narrative describing the impact. This is where story maps comes in. Example The following images show screenshots of a story map. The story starts with a dashboard show some information of possible risk per ward in the Mangaung Metropolitan Municipalities area of jurisdiction. This dashboard is interactive and depends on information from risk assessments. The following tab shows the risk value per ward. The third map shows the location of possible water pollution points in the municipality. A narrative is added to describe the map which can include for example disaster risk methodology, recommendations and/or standard operational procedures.
What is GeoDesign and what is the relationship with Disaster Risk Assessment (or any other GISc related project)? This short narrative will discuss this. GeoDesign In short: GeoDesign can be broken into two syllables, Geo and Design. Geo represents the geographic space or space that is referenced to the surface of the earth (geo-referenced). Design is the thought process comprising the creation of something and therefore GeoDesign is a thought process comprising the creation of entities in space. To implement GeoDesign practically a process needs to be followed. This process is very similar to a scientific research project and is shown in the figure below. The process starts, as usual, with a problem for which a solution must be fined. To do this the problem must first be described after it can be analysed. To visualise the problem is part of the analysing the problem. This is where “geo” comes in by visualising the problem using GISc techniques and software. Through various processes and techniques ( research and/designed led innovation or brainstormings) solution can be identified and again GIS can be used to visualise the solution. The solution/ prototype must be tested and if successful, implemented in the real world. Disaster Risk Assessment Disaster risk assessment follows the same process. A next blog will describe the practical implementation of GeoDesign and disaster risk assessment through conducting a GISc project during which a specific project plan will be discussed. The problem can be to identify possible water pollution areas. Through study and research, the problem is described and analysed. GISc techniques can be used to visualise the possible areas and through this visualisation possible water pollution areas can be confirmed and presented in map format. Through ground truthing, the assessment can be tested and incorporated into a disaster risk profile and disaster risk reduction strategy and programs.
Disaster risk assessment is a spatial study or analysis. The statement is logical and true because hazards occur at a specific location and its impact on people and environment is also based on the question – where. This makes GIS an ideal tool to do Disaster Risk Assessment. A successful disaster risk assessment using GIS starts with a proper project plan. This project plan begins with the theoretical framework of what disaster risk is, which determine the formula or classification to use when calculating disaster risk for an area. A simple classification of disaster risk, that is normally used, is that disaster risk is the function of characteristics of a hazard, vulnerability of communities and the capacity to mitigate the impact of the hazard. The trick is to convert the identified theoretical framework into a GIS model and/or methodology. GIS/spatial data that represent the characteristics/indicators of the hazard, vulnerability and capacity to cope needs to be found or created. A scientifically based disaster risk assessment is not possible without the correct theoretical framework and associated GIS methodology and data. All this is also true when conducting a spatial analysis to investigate a spatial problem and to develop a solution. We as GIS practitioners know it as GeoDesign. GeoDesign: